Verified
A source that has been reviewed and is trusted enough to appear in final report workflows when the article itself is relevant.
A plain-English reference for the words and decisions used inside the Mozilla Media Monitor. The goal is to make the review workflow inspectable, so analysts can see where a link was missed, filtered, scraped, or kept.
A source that has been reviewed and is trusted enough to appear in final report workflows when the article itself is relevant.
A useful source that should stay visible for learning and coverage checks, but is not yet treated as a final-report source.
A source worth monitoring, but handled cautiously because it may be noisy, indirect, syndicated, financial, job-board-like, or special-purpose.
A publisher that has not yet been manually assigned to one of the three source tiers.
The list of URLs pasted in by an analyst from the manually built report.
The pasted URL matched a record the monitor already stored in the selected time window.
The pasted URL had no matching monitor record. This usually points to a source coverage gap, timing gap, or URL matching gap.
The monitor kept an article that was not in the pasted human report links. These are candidates for analyst review.
The monitor saw the link, but an intentional rule filtered it out before it entered the normal human review queue.
The monitor found the link but could not read enough article text. The link may be important, but the app has less evidence.
data/feeds.csv.Analysts can add feeds, block noisy publishers, move publishers between Verified, Discovery, and Watchlist, mark articles reviewed, and use the compare page to identify source gaps. Those actions improve coverage without asking the AI to silently hide more material.
The safest operating rule is: improve what the monitor sees first, improve scraping second, and only then tighten automatic filtering. That keeps the app from overreaching while the team is still learning where coverage gaps come from.